Zakir Naik - The Talking Nonsense

Recently Dr Zakir Naik was refused entry to Britain, so I thought I'd have a meander through his past words to see if the UK government was right to exclude him.



1. "Who will decide what is good and what is bad" HE GETS A ROUND OF APPLAUSE! Can the audience not see that the subtext of this seemingly simple answer is...


"The Old men who are my bosses have already decided what is good and bad for you. If we let everybody just choose the best bits of religions, we lose control of you."

The answer should be, of course, individuals can decide, peacefully, for themselves.

Dictatorship from the Dark Ages is not required.


2. "I challenge any human being to point out a single principle of Islam which is against humanity as a whole" (3mins 50secs) ANOTHER ROUND OF APPLAUSE! The indoctrination of audience is astonishing and frightening. Their reaction shows that they are all totally convinced that nobody would ever be able to meet his challenge! So, I suspect they, at least, are going to be a bit shocked and cross but hey you only live once so, I'll take that challenge doc. If you've not read them yet Dr Zakir Naik, please see...


The Fuss about Fitna


Islam - The Stranglehold Religion?


Burka - Symbol of Enslavement


Savage Islam 1 - Blasphemy


Savage Islam 2 - The Imperfect Book


Savage Islam 3 - The Violent Book


Savage Islam 4 - Inferior Morality


Savage Islam 5 - Global Domination


Savage Islam 6 - False Prophet


Savage Islam 7 - Evil by Inaction


3. His reasons for why men should have more than 1 wife (this is a precis of his words because he goes on a bit.) "using logic there are more women in the world than men." (4 mins 50 secs) his reasons are to support the Qur'an's Ham-fisted solution to any problem that there may be between man and female population 'men are allowed more than 1 wife'


At no point does he wander into the territory of exploring a better solution! The only alternative he offers is "single women must become public property" He goes on to spout "in Islam when you have a second wife you have to give equal rights, she has honour, she has respect." (7 mins 30 secs) The obvious inference here, that a woman cannot be honoured or respected unless she is the property of a man, is a disgracefully misogynistic and archaic statement of the foulest order. Public property! Obviously women should not have to be owned by a man in order to live within society. Society should support women who wish to live alone to do so.


A human, is its own property!


And the words 'have to' (meaning 'must') suggests that without Islam a man is incapable of honouring / respecting a second wife!


That sounds to me distinctly like Women should have the option of more than 1 husband!


Dr Zakir Naik's words seem to me to be twisty and dishonourable.


Is Dr Zakir Naik mistaken or deliberately deceptive?


Even if his life depended on it, would you trust him to tell, or even recognise the truth?






For point 4 I'm going to switch to a different emission of crud from this twister of truth. You don't have to watch the whole clip because about 7 of the 9 minutes length can be summed up in "blah, blah, blah", "that's condescending", "that's misleading".


(I've included another clip by subach at the end of this post


that deals with the numerous twists of truth in the speech.)


As an aside, before I get into my final point, at 6 minutes and 30 seconds, Dr Zakir Naik recites of a list of chapters and verses. The audience give him a rousing round of applause but their adulation is more about how accomplished a parrot he is. This kind of display of recitation was the stuff of children's performances in Victorian parlour games.


I find it worrying that the audience considers his ability to relay his brain-washing worthy of applause!


I can only assume that, in Islam, being an automaton is praised higher than original thinking!


the stupid Zakir ...


the stupid Zakir Naik is mixing up to make a conflict between Hindus and Muslim. He claims that Kalki is mohammed OK we go in details. I read full story of Kalki and Prophet Mohammed. he says first fathers name means "god slave and mothers name means peace and Kalki riding same as Mohammed. Thats all this end of the story to make conflict but I say they are not at all same person go forward to the story Mohammed has nine wifes , Kalki have only one wife Padma to be continued


This idiot has no right to declare that his religion is the only correct religion... he can believe so, but that can only be his own personal opinion...he has no right to impose the condition that others cannot practice their path or others cannot differ from him... he behaves as if he is another prophet and tries to indoctrinate innocent people with his stupid logic.

Zakir - Khal Nayak Ki Sarkar..

KIA YA JEHAD HAI- YAH JEHALAD HAI

Aslam o alekum





aap logo k Nazdeek Jihad kia he???


Jihad kab , kiss se, or kiss waqt , kiss k Hukam se kia jata he???


kia Mojoda Taliban Pakistan main Jihad kar rahe hen???
kia Masjidon main Bacho ko Quran o Hadees ki Taleem ki Aart main Aslah Chalana , on ko Desht gardi ki Traning dena , Goverment ki Plot par Na Jaiz Qabza karna , Girl's ko Aslah Chalana sikhana??
Masjidon main Na Jaiz Aslah Rakhna kia yeh Jihad he???
Sare-e-Aam QATAL karna.??
phir oss ki Video bana kar ISLAM ko badnaam karna??
kia yeh Jihad he???
yeh sab kon si Hades se Sabit hen???
ya kiss SAHABI ne yeh JIHAD kia???
Aslah k Zorro par kabhi na to kisi NABI ne Islam phelaya he..
or na hi kabhi kisi SAHABI ne Islam phelaya he..
to yeh New log (Munafiq Taliban) kahan se aa gae??
apni Shariat ly kar...????
agar pore Country mian Chand nazar nahi aya to Apni Shariad banae wale kehte hen k ham Saudi Arab k Mutabik eid or dosre Islami Tehwar karen ge??
yeh hen woh log jinn ki aap Ankhen bande kar k Himayat karte hen??
Islam Name he SALAMATI ka...
na k Desht Gardi ka....






Islam Dehshat Gardi Ki Taleem Kabhi Nahin Deta Hai ....
Jo Aam Logon Aurton Bacho Ko Maarte Hain Woh Bilkul Jihad Nahin Hai ...
Yahan Per Ek Baat Aur Bhi Hai Ke Media Per Qabza Islam Dushmano Ka Hai Aur WOh Aksar Islam AUr Musalmano Ko Badnam Karne Ke Liye Woh Sab Dikhate Hain Jo Unka Khud Ka Kiya Hua Hota Hai Aur Yeh Baat Bahot Baar Sabit Bhi Ho Chuki Hai ..............!!




" Jisne Allah Ki Narazgi Ke Badle Logon Ki Razamandi Chahi, Allah Usse Naraz Hoga Aur Logon Ko Bhi Usse Naraz Kar Dega, Aur Jisne Logon Ki Narazi Ke Badle Allah Ki Raza Chahi, Allah Usse Raazi Hoga Aur Logon Ko Bhi Usse Raazi Kar Dega. "






" Huq Ka Parastar Kabhi Zaleel Nahin Hota Chah E Sara Zamana Uske Khilaf Ho Jaye..... Baatil Ka Pairokaar Kabhi Izzat Nahin Paata Chahe Chaand Uski Paishani Per Nikal Aaye ..!! "

Why do Islamic terrorist like Hamas and Taliban kill innocent civilians and commit suicide attacks?

Aren't those two of the greatest sins of all? I mean seeing as they say they're fighting for Islam wouldn't you think they would "follow the rules" so to speak rather than say attacking people on their way home from work? It seems extremely contradictory to me. They do and they do it in the name of Islam and tell the World they are doing it for Islam. Then the alleged moderate Moslems say they are not real Moslems but there are thousands and thousands and thousands of them killing in the name of Islam and getting it wrong over and over again.

They murder and are called martyrs and we get told it is a peaceful religion and the media gets it all wrong.


Do research into Islam the moderates say.Well when you google Islam and terrorists you could spend a month reading the links.


My friends and I have never been able to understand it.

Pakistan Taliban killed Benazir Bhutto:

Islamabad: Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) was responsible for the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, concluded a probe carried out by the country's Federal Investigation Agency.




The agency is likely to submit its report before an anti-terrorism court Oct 30, Dawn reported Tuesday.



The investigation report has accused slain TTP chief Baitullah Mehsud of masterminding Bhutto's murder.





Bhutto was assassinated Dec 27, 2007 after addressing an election rally in the northern Pakistani city of Rawalpindi. A teenaged shooter was seen aiming for her head in the CCTV footage before a powerful suicide blast killed at least 24 people participating in the rally.



The interior ministry at that time had accused Taliban of plotting to kill Bhutto while the doctors had said that "her head banged against the lever of the sunroof which caused her death".



Sources said that the agency had not been able complete its investigation earlier due to three absconders - Abdur Rehman, Saddam and Faiz Mohammad.





The report now says that the three absconders were killed in a military operation in tribal areas.



Five TTP member, who have been arrested, are Rafaqat, Hussain, Sher Zaman, Aitzaz Shah and Abdul Rashid.



Khalid Mehmood who led the team that probed the case told the daily that its report will be presented before the court Oct 30.



The probe team had earlier decided to send a questionnaire to the interior minister since he could not be summoned or interrogated as he is a minister. However, no questionnaire was eventually sent to him.



Ashfaq Anwar, who was head of Rawalpindi's Elite Force at the time of the killing and was responsible for Bhutto's security, has gone to Britain on a scholarship, the media report said.

Why is Israel so scared off attacking Iran without the U.S? iran is tiger

Why is that small state bothering Palestine and other much less armed groups like hamas but is pleading the US to attack Iran? This would only spread into a much larger conflict if the US get involved. Plus, Bush said he preferred diplomacy than military conflict. Obama, of course, is less likely to attack Iran than Bush for the state of israel. Israel spends much of our media influence to scare Americans into believeing in a terror threat from islamic States to keep them in war mode. But no one percieves Iran as a threat BUT Israel. Israel must understand that America has nothing to gain from attacking Iran for Israel. Nothing but high casualties, oil prices and an even worse reputation.



Israel should sit down and talk with palestine and these nations and direct it's military at other militaries instead of apartment complexes, schools and hospitals. Who could possibly war for a nation like that that first off isn't even a territorial responsibility? Especially, with the amount of debt.

Ahmadinejad: We’re Not Afraid of Israel or the US

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad continued his attacks against Israel and the US on Sunday.







In an interview he gave to the Al-Jazeera network, Ahmadinejad said that Israel is “too weak” to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, and added that Israel did not have "the courage to do it... and I do not think its threat is serious." He also said that his country would act decisively against anyone who attempts a military strike against it.






The interview was given in Farsi and translated to Arabic. Ahmadinejad also dismissed the possibility of a US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, saying that "America is not interested in sparking a military confrontation. There are no logical reasons for the United States to carry out such an act. Do you believe an army that has been defeated by a small army in Iraq can enter into a war with a large and well trained army like the Iranian army?"






Ahmadinejad offered the US his country’s friendship, saying that “the friendship of Iran is much better than its hostility.”






Earlier on Sunday, Iran announced the launching of a new unmanned jet bomber dubbed “an ambassador of death” to Israel and other enemies.






"The jet, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship," Ahmadinejad told Iranian officials during the announcement. He added that the aircraft will help "keep the enemy paralyzed in its bases…until the enemies of humanity lose hope of ever attacking the Iranian nation."






On Saturday, the Bushehr nuclear plant became operational and is supposed to produce electricity from the uranium being supplied by Russia. The Bushehr fuel is enriched to approximately 3.5%, while weapons-grade fuel is enriched to over 90%.






While Israel did not comment on the opening of the Bushehr plant, Gary Samore, President Obama’s top adviser on nuclear issues, was quoted in the New York Times on Friday as saying that “we think that they have roughly a year dash time,” referring to the minimum amount of time it would take to convert the fuel to weapons-grade uranium. The report in the Times said that the US and Israel would be able to detect within weeks of when this process began and have a considerable amount of time to still consider military strikes.

Americans pro-Israel, scared of Iran, skeptical of outreach

The hawkish Emergency Committee for Israel is coming out with a poll today that backs its view that the U.S. has a deeply pro-Israel electorate, one that's alarmed about Iran's intentions and skeptical of President Obama's outreach to the Muslim world.







They've shared GOP pollster John McLaughlin's survey of 1,000 likely voters, and its cross-tabs, in full. And while there are always reasons to be skeptical of polls by advocacy groups that back their views, the sample -- 51% of those surveyed have a favorable view of Obama's defense and national security policy -- tilts if anything slightly more toward the White House than other recent public polling.






The results suggest that President Obama's stance toward the Middle East is not as popular as his foreign policy as a whole, with a plurality disapproving of his handling of Israel and, strikingly, 47% saying his policy of "outreach to the Muslim world" has "decreased" U.S. security, to the 33% who say it's increased our security.






The poll -- using questions that some may find leading -- finds large majorities don't believe that the U.S. can stop Iran's nuclear program with sanctions, and surprising numbers are open to military action: 60% said they'd support a military strike if sanctions don't work.






Underlying this: While a slim plurality said Iran was unlikely to shoot a nuclear weapon at the U.S. (the questions don't worry too much about the actual capabilities), large majorities said they thought it likely that Ian would attack Israel (80%) or provide a nuclear weapon to terrorists (85%).






The poll also makes the case that support for Israel -- the focus of ECI's slashing ad campaigns this year -- is a salient issue to large numbers of voters. It finds that 53% would be more likely to vote for a candidate "you perceive as pro-Israel," to 24% who would be less likely. While the pro-Israel candidate wins the favor of all of the political groups, Democrats are nearly split on the issue, while Republicans overwhelmingly say they would vote for the pro-Israel option.






UPDATE: Bill Kristol uses the numbers to argue that the "real Israel lobby" is "the American people."

Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites

Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.







In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran.






To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom’s air defences will return to full alert.






“The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way,” said a US defence source in the area. “They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren’t scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State Department.”






Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing,” said one.






The four main targets for any raid on Iran would be the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Qom, the gas storage development at Isfahan and the heavy-water reactor at Arak. Secondary targets include the lightwater reactor at Bushehr, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium when complete.






The targets lie as far as 1,400 miles (2,250km) from Israel; the outer limits of their bombers’ range, even with aerial refuelling. An open corridor across northern Saudi Arabia would significantly shorten the distance. An airstrike would involve multiple waves of bombers, possibly crossing Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Aircraft attacking Bushehr, on the Gulf coast, could swing beneath Kuwait to strike from the southwest.






Passing over Iraq would require at least tacit agreement to the raid from Washington. So far, the Obama Administration has refused to give its approval as it pursues a diplomatic solution to curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Military analysts say Israel has held back only because of this failure to secure consensus from America and Arab states. Military analysts doubt that an airstrike alone would be sufficient to knock out the key nuclear facilities, which are heavily fortified and deep underground or within mountains. However, if the latest sanctions prove ineffective the pressure from the Israelis on Washington to approve military action will intensify. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium after the UN Security Council imposed its toughest sanctions yet in an effort to halt the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme, which Tehran claims is intended for civil energy purposes only. President Ahmadinejad has described the UN resolution as “a used handkerchief, which should be thrown in the dustbin”.






Israeli officials refused to comment yesterday on details for a raid on Iran, which the Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has refused to rule out. Questioned on the option of a Saudi flight path for Israeli bombers, Aharaon Zeevi Farkash, who headed military intelligence until 2006 and has been involved in war games simulating a strike on Iran, said: “I know that Saudi Arabia is even more afraid than Israel of an Iranian nuclear capacity.”






In 2007 Israel was reported to have used Turkish air space to attack a suspected nuclear reactor being built by Iran’s main regional ally, Syria. Although Turkey publicly protested against the “violation” of its air space, it is thought to have turned a blind eye in what many saw as a dry run for a strike on Iran’s far more substantial — and better-defended — nuclear sites.






Israeli intelligence experts say that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are at least as worried as themselves and the West about an Iranian nuclear arsenal.Israel has sent missile-class warships and at least one submarine capable of launching a nuclear warhead through the Suez Canal for deployment in the Red Sea within the past year, as both a warning to Iran and in anticipation of a possible strike. Israeli newspapers reported last year that high-ranking officials, including the former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have met their Saudi Arabian counterparts to discuss the Iranian issue. It was also reported that Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, met Saudi intelligence officials last year to gain assurances that Riyadh would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets violating Saudi airspace during the bombing run. Both governments have denied the reports.